Skip to content

Brand

How often AI names Loops

Loops is named on the Email and newsletters board in 9% of the 295 answers from ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode that score it over the last four weeks, too few runs or questions to place, so it sits below the line. ChatGPT names it most often (18%, 18 of 100 runs), Gemini least (2%, 2 of 100 runs). Named more often on that board: Omnisend (38%), Kit (35%) and MailerLite (32%).

Cubsy Loops is on the list. The number is a share of runs, across the questions we track. Is AI picking you? Tap me for a free scan →

Does each AI recommend Loops?

Share of each engine's email and newsletters answers that name Loops, last four weeks. Share of answers, not rank.

ChatGPT names Loops a bit more often (18%) than Gemini (2%). A 16 pt gap.

  1. Does ChatGPT recommend Loops?

    18%

    Long shot. ChatGPT named Loops in 18 of its 100 email and newsletters answers that score it (18%), last four weeks. That is how often the name shows up in sampled answers, not a ranking of quality.

    ChatGPT's Email and newsletters picks

  2. Does Gemini recommend Loops?

    2%

    Rarely named. Gemini named Loops in 2 of its 100 email and newsletters answers that score it (2%), last four weeks. That is how often the name shows up in sampled answers, not a ranking of quality.

    Gemini's Email and newsletters picks

  3. Does Google AI Mode recommend Loops?

    6%

    Rarely named. Google AI Mode named Loops in 6 of its 95 email and newsletters answers that score it (6%), last four weeks. That is how often the name shows up in sampled answers, not a ranking of quality.

    Google AI Mode's Email and newsletters picks

By question

  1. What's the best email tool for B2B SaaS onboarding emails? In the mix 43% of runs 32% to 56% · 60 runs GPT 90%Gem 10%AI 30%

One row per tracked question in Loops's category, last four weeks.

Questions about Loops in AI answers

How visible is Loops in AI search?

Loops is named on the Email and newsletters board in 9% of the 295 answers from ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode that score it over the last four weeks, too few runs or questions to place, so it sits below the line. ChatGPT names it most often (18%, 18 of 100 runs), Gemini least (2%, 2 of 100 runs).

Does ChatGPT recommend Loops?

Over the last four weeks, ChatGPT named Loops in 18 of its 100 answers that score it (18%) on our email and newsletters questions. Across every engine the share is 9%. That is how often the name shows up, not a ranking of quality.

Which other Email and newsletters brands do AI answers name?

Other brands placed on the Email and newsletters board over the last four weeks: Omnisend (38%), Kit (35%) and MailerLite (32%). Brands are often named in the same answer as Loops, so this is not a list of replacements.

How is this measured?

Each week the same 5 email and newsletters buyer questions are asked as written in logged-out US sessions of ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode. A brand's figure is the share of the answers that score it which name it, over a rolling four weeks. Where a name sits inside an answer is not a rank. To see how AI answers treat your own brand, run the free AI visibility scan at agnostify.com/audit.

How we measure

Each question is asked as written, from a logged-out United States session on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode.

How is a score calculated?

On a category board, the score is the share of every valid run across that category's questions that names the brand, over a rolling four weeks, with a 95% Wilson interval. Rows are ordered by the low end of that interval, so a brand named on one question cannot outrank one named across the category. A brand named in fewer than 10 runs, or on only one question, sits below the line as low confidence. On a question page the share is of that question's runs. Where a name sits in the answer is not a rank.

Which brands count where?

Names are matched to a reviewed brand list, and a brand counts only on questions in its own category. Names that are ordinary words, such as Streak, Loops and Instantly, count only when the answer clearly means the product. A CRM named as an integration in a meeting-notes answer is not a point on the meeting-notes board. A brand named in the question itself, as in “alternatives to Profound”, is not scored on that question, so those runs count neither for nor against it. A name that is not on the list stays off the board until a person adds it.

Will this match a signed-in chat?

A logged-out session has no memory and no personalization, so a signed-in person can see a different answer.

Cited pages are the sources that engine marked as citations, not every link in the raw response.

Run by Agnostify. Agnostify builds custom AI systems for teams, and measures how AI recommends brands. This board is a measurement, not a promise that a brand will be recommended.

Monday movers

Which names started and stopped showing up, once a week. The letter is not sending yet. This saves your place on the same list as the rest of Agnostify, tagged ai-picks. You will get a confirmation email first.